William Shakespeare · c. 1600
Read Hamlet with context
You can read the play and save notes and quotes from it. The play has been seen as representing a sea change in the modern self, which is increasingly inward and thought-tormented, but also far more self-aware, for good and ill. You can also follow curated paths through Hamlet's grief, revenge, staged madness, theater-within-theater, Ophelia's pressure, and the play's questions about death, conscience, and action.
Key Reading Paths
- Grief and mourning: Hamlet's inward sorrow, the court's pressure to move on, and Ophelia's grief.
- Memory and forgetting: remembrance as command, burden, public ritual, theatrical proof, and possible release.
- Revenge and conscience: the Ghost's command, Hamlet's delay, Claudius's guilt, and the moral logic of revenge.
- Theater and surveillance: madness as performance, friendship as spying, and drama as a test of truth.
- Ophelia and social pressure: family control, court politics, gendered obedience, and emotional collapse.
- Death and afterlife: suicide, ghosts, judgment, bodily decay, and providence.
Teaching and Learning
Hamlet begins with Denmark on guard against a threatened attack from Norway. The first words, “Who’s there?”, are a practical question for a soldier on watch. They also open one of the play’s essential inquiries: Who, beyond ourselves, can we trust? Within ourselves, what do we trust?
Hamlet questions his mother’s fidelity, his uncle’s innocence, Ophelia’s loyalty, his friends’ intentions, and even the words of his father’s ghost. He turns the same scrutiny inward, examining his own fears, motives, and delay. Reading the play means learning to follow this questioning—and questioning Hamlet in return.
An inward turn
One way into this English Renaissance play is to consider Hamlet as a modern, increasingly inward-looking person wrestling with inherited demands for obedience, honor, and revenge. He seeks an authentic self within a world of compromised relationships and political performance. Yet his capacity to examine everything, including himself, complicates his ability to act.
Attend to the movement of his language: a thought interrupted, an image revised, a question that unsettles an apparent certainty. Compare his private speeches with his public exchanges. Does reflection give him freedom, deepen his confinement, or do both?
Extend this inquiry through comparison with myth and epic, Platonic self-examination, or Dante’s account of the soul. What changes in Hamlet? Let particular passages test the claim that the play represents a sea change in the understanding of the self. Where might those earlier works complicate the distinction?
Learning to hear Shakespeare
Readers can learn to make meaning through Shakespeare’s original English. “Shakespearese” becomes more familiar through use: hearing it, speaking it, trying out its rhythms, and returning to difficult passages with a stronger sense of the scene.
If you are guiding others through the play, practice this with them. Read dramatically. Ham it up, chew the scenery, out-Herod Herod. Then try the same lines quietly, bitterly, affectionately, or with deliberate restraint. Notice what each performance reveals—and what the words resist.
Pause to establish who is speaking, to whom, and with what apparent purpose. Clarify unfamiliar words without losing the movement of the exchange. A paraphrase can check understanding; returning to Shakespeare’s phrasing reveals how the meaning is made.
Reading performance as interpretation
A filmed scene offers another text to examine. In selections from Laurence Olivier’s 1948 Hamlet, study the mise-en-scène: the arrangement of bodies, space, lighting, and objects within the frame. Consider blocking—where performers stand and how they move—and the camera’s decisions about what we see.
Who occupies the center? Who remains at the margin? Where does the staging give men authority and constrain women? Test these questions against particular shots, then return to Shakespeare’s scene. Which possibilities does the film develop, and which does it leave aside? A performance makes an argument about the play, whether or not it states that argument.
Questions for discussion
- Where does a speech change direction, and what prompts that change? Try performing the turn in two different ways.
- What does the audience know that a character does not? How does that difference affect our judgment of the scene?
- Which passage most strongly challenges your account of Hamlet? What would you need to revise to do it justice?
Bring criticism from differing perspectives into these inquiries. Ask what each interpretation helps us see, which passages support it, and where the play presses beyond it.
Writing toward an interpretation
Choose a question that matters to you and develop an argument substantial enough to encounter difficulty. The strongest essays integrate analysis of form with analysis of content: how the words work, in style and structure, is inseparable from what they are about.
Follow an image, a pattern of interruptions, a contrast between scenes, or a shift between private and public speech. Explain how those choices shape your interpretation. Address a passage that complicates your claim, and allow that complication to sharpen it. The aim is a persuasive reading whose precision does justice to the play’s complexity.
Writing about Hamlet: Possible Paper Topics
For readers developing an extended interpretation, independently or in a course. Choose a direction below, or propose a question of your own. Develop an argument about the play as a whole through close attention to particular passages, explaining how Shakespeare’s language and dramatic choices make the meaning you describe.
- The search for an authentic self. How does Hamlet distinguish who he is from the roles others assign him? Compare a soliloquy with a public exchange. Consider whether his inward turn makes personal freedom possible, and where his language complicates his claims to sincerity.
- Gender and the limits of identity. Examine the identities available to Gertrude and Ophelia within the family and court. Trace who describes or judges them, then read those judgments against their own words, silences, and actions. Where do they resist the categories imposed on them?
- Between inherited authority and modern doubt. Explore a tension between obedience and independent judgment, revenge and justice, or religious belief and skepticism. Compare how characters establish authority in their speech. How does the play test competing ways of deciding what is true and what ought to be done?
- Integrity in a false society. How can a person act legitimately within a world of surveillance, manipulation, and compromised authority? Set a scene of spying beside one of Hamlet’s own performances. Examine how concealment shapes both the action and the audience’s access to truth.
- Death and the limits of knowledge. Trace Hamlet’s changing understanding of death through the Ghost, a soliloquy, and the graveyard. How do imagery, shifts in tone, and the physical presence of decay alter the questions he can ask?
- Fate, flaw, and the possibility of redemption. What produces the tragedy: character, circumstance, inherited obligation, accident, or some interaction among them? Examine the sequence of decisions and reversals. Consider whether the ending offers reconciliation or redemption, and what remains unresolved.
- The active and the contemplative person. Compare Hamlet with Laertes or Fortinbras. How does Shakespeare arrange their stories to test the attractions and dangers of decisive action? Consider whether reflection is an obstacle to responsibility or one of its conditions.
- Memory as a claim upon the living. Examine remembrance as duty, burden, consolation, or an instrument of power. Follow repeated words and images from the Ghost’s command into later scenes. How do pressures to remember or forget shape Hamlet’s identity and choices?
- The world and the self as texts. Explore how characters interpret speeches, gestures, performances, and one another. Use the play within the play to examine the possibility of reading correctly. How does Shakespeare place the audience in a similar position?
- A question of your own. Begin with a passage, contradiction, or dramatic choice that you cannot easily explain. Develop a question that calls for interpretation, then follow its implications through the play. Identify evidence that might challenge your answer as well as support it.
Recommended Books and Films
For further inquiry into Shakespeare’s characters, Hamlet’s inwardness, and the choices that turn a script into a performance.
These are affiliate links to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
-
Hamlet — Folger Shakespeare Library
William Shakespeare · Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine
A dependable companion for close reading and performance, with explanatory notes that clarify difficult language. Its value lies in helping readers hear and interpret Shakespeare’s words with greater precision.
-
Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human
Harold Bloom · Literary criticism
Bloom places Hamlet at the center of his expansive argument about Shakespeare’s creation of inwardness. A provocative companion to the soliloquies, especially for readers interested in self-discovery through speech.
-
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Edited by Harold Bloom · Modern Critical Interpretations
This collection brings competing critical arguments into conversation, offering readers a way to examine how different assumptions about character, language, and tragedy produce different accounts of the same play.
-
Shakespeare and Society: Critical Studies in Shakespearean Drama
Terence Eagleton · Literary criticism
Eagleton situates Shakespearean drama within social life. His approach broadens an inquiry into inwardness by attending to the institutions, obligations, and relations of power that give private conflicts their shape.
-
Hamlet (1948)
Directed by and starring Laurence Olivier · Film on Prime Video
Olivier’s concentrated interpretation makes inward struggle visible through performance, lighting, and camera placement. A useful companion for studying how cinematic choices shape our understanding of Hamlet and the court.
-
Hamlet (1996)
Directed by and starring Kenneth Branagh · Film on Prime Video
Branagh’s expansive film offers a contrasting interpretation of private thought and public power. Read beside Olivier’s, it makes differences in delivery, setting, and dramatic emphasis especially available for close comparison.
-
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
Directed by Tom Stoppard · 25th Anniversary Edition · Film on Prime Video
Stoppard shifts attention to two supporting figures whose uncertainty unsettles familiar ideas of choice and fate. The film opens a fresh perspective on what Shakespeare’s characters—and his audience—can know.
-
Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity
Charles Taylor · Philosophy · Paperback
Taylor traces the moral and philosophical sources of modern identity. His history offers a substantial framework for placing Hamlet’s inwardness, self-scrutiny, and competing obligations within a longer inquiry into the self.